Final essay for the course
ISKM09 English for Information Studies and Library Science
In my essay, I have chosen to engage with the compelling exchange between Ken Robinson and Tim Leunig on the topic of cultivating creativity in education. After careful consideration, I find myself in partial disagreement with Leunig’s emphasis on foundational knowledge as the primary driver of creativity. While I acknowledge the importance of a strong knowledge base, I firmly believe that creativity should be granted more prominent recognition in the educational landscape.
I have to disagree with Leunig’s viewpoint that creativity can be adequately nurtured through a focus solely on foundational knowledge. While foundational knowledge provides the necessary framework for intellectual growth, it is the integration of creativity that truly unlocks the potential for innovation and critical thinking. By fostering an environment that values imagination, individuality, and divergent thinking, we can empower students to explore new horizons and develop innovative solutions to complex problems.
However, it would be remiss of me to disregard Leunig’s perspective entirely. I agree that foundational knowledge acts as a catalyst for creativity, providing a solid foundation upon which new ideas can flourish. It is the synergy between a comprehensive understanding of fundamental concepts and the freedom to explore alternative approaches that truly propels creativity to its fullest potential.
My response to the dialogue between Robinson and Leunig acknowledges the significance of both viewpoints. While I firmly advocate for the integration of creativity within education, I recognize the value of foundational knowledge in facilitating creative thinking. Striking a delicate balance between these two aspects will enable us to create an educational environment that nurtures the holistic development of students, equipping them with the skills and mindset necessary for success in a rapidly evolving world.
A balanced approach to education that combines traditional and alternative methods is crucial for nurturing creativity. By valuing foundational knowledge and embracing divergent thinking, we can create an inclusive environment that empowers students to express their unique creativity. Striking this balance equips students with the necessary tools for success while fostering innovation and personal growth.
In my essay, I have outlined the importance of incorporating both traditional and alternative approaches to education, drawing inspiration from the insightful dialogue between Ken Robinson and Tim Leunig. By embracing the strengths of each perspective, we can create a comprehensive educational system that fosters creativity, critical thinking, and personal expression. This approach will equip students with the skills needed to thrive in an ever-changing world, ensuring their individual growth and contributing to the advancement of society as a whole.
LEUNING, Tim. Why real creativity is based on knowledge. TEDxWhitehall [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vajIsWwHEMc&ab_channel=TEDxTalks
ROBINSON, Ken. Do schools kill creativity? TED: Ideas Worth Spreading [online]. Dostupné z: https://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity/c
ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Emile. Phoemixx Classics Ebooks. [online] 2021. Dostupné z: https://books.google.com/books?hl=cs&lr=&id=IwFMEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=ROUSSEAU,+Jean-Jacques.+Emile&ots=54JQJQ1gGQ&sig=2S-3zU-KSOIhy9_aGM5c3Eze60U
RUNCO, Mark A.; ACAR, Selcuk; CAYIRDAG, Nur. A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity. [online] 2017, 24: 242-249. Dostupné z: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187116301481